[ RadSafe ] Solar stuff
Brennan, Mike (DOH)
Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV
Thu Mar 19 13:11:48 CDT 2015
Hi, Joe.
I am a HUGE fan of solar energy in the appropriate place. For example, there shouldn't be a flat roof in Southern California that isn't covered with solar energy systems. Ditto Florida, much of Texas, all of Hawaii, and at least parts of other states. It is good from an energy policy POV and a National Security POV. I think that in many areas parking lots should be partially roofed over with structures that collect solar energy and rainwater, provide covered parking, and allow for much more efficient lighting.
Orbital Solar, on the other hand, has some huge problems that need to be solved. The first is cost-to-orbit. I haven't looked at what it costs to get to geosynch recently, but Low Earth Orbit is in the tens of thousands of dollars per kilo. Orbital construction techniques are still pretty primitive, and I am pretty sure we want structures that are WAY too large for a single launch. The tech that is really needed is a space elevator, which is not on the near horizon.
As for the accuracy of the beam; sure, it can be done, but there is a big difference between missing a reflector on the Moon, and thus putting a few extra photons on a piece of Moon surface, and missing the receiving antenna and putting a few megawatts on the nearby town. Or someone intentionally taking control, and using it to destroy the power grid.
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of JPreisig at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:55 AM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Solar stuff
Radsafe/Mike,
Good observations, Mike. I like nuclear, but will look at solar also.
Don't need to transmit the solar energy all at once, and can have multiple satellites.
As for pinpoint accuracy, we currently do LLR (Lunar Laser Ranging) to a retroreflector on the Moon (a few meters wide???) and receive the return signal photons (20 photons???) with a microchannel plate. For more information on LLR, see Bogdan Maglich's Adventures in Experimental Physics or Goddard Space Flight Center's Website or the internet.
Somebody is working on this solar transmission stuff. Of course, I like the controllability of Nuclear Power.
Joe Preisig
In a message dated 3/19/2015 1:32:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV writes:
Years ago I read a thread where someone was talking about how nuclear power wasn't necessary, because solar power satellites could produce a nearly unlimited amount of electricity that could be beamed down to Earth. I pointed out there were still some non-trivial practical issues to solve, and that if he didn't like thousand megawatt nuclear facilities, he REALLY wouldn't like terawatt microwave lasers in space. If you assume the satellites are in geosynchronous orbit a mile-wide receiving antenna requires far better than pin-point accuracy.
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of JPreisig at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:41 AM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Solar stuff
Radsafe,
Some interesting stuff about solar energy lately.
Australian researchers are claiming 40% conversion efficiencies for their solar cells.
Other solar researchers are thinking about ways to collect solar energy in space (in Earth orbit) and how to beam the energy to the Earth's surface. Too bad Tesla isn't around to help with this idea. Have satellites around the Earth with solar collecters???
The other idea is to place optics/mirrors etc. in Earth orbit to direct Sunlight to collection points on the Earth's surface. Sounds much like the Bond movie --- the Man with the Golden Gun (the Solex). Also sounds like solar weapons systems tinkered with by the Germans in WW II.
Time to get a second MS/MA degree in solar energy/EE/Applied Physics from
the Colorado School of Mines (Solar Energy Research Institute) or somewhere like that..???.
Joe Preisig
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list