[ RadSafe ] Australian Uranium in Antarctic Ice ?

Dan McCarn hotgreenchile at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 08:06:52 CDT 2016


Jaro - the background is probably too high on land to distinguish that. In
ice, it would be more distinctive, but probably just trace. That's why t
would be important to determine the other associated trace metals. Copper
would be dominant.

Dan ii

Dan W McCarn, Geologist
108 Sherwood Blvd
Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
+1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dwmccarn

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Jaro Franta <jaro_10kbq at videotron.ca>
wrote:

> Dan,
> Wouldn't they also show up on the Radiometric Map, in the vicinity of RD ?
> https://db.tt/pN8fmZNI
> Thnx
>
>  Jaro
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Dan McCarn
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:06 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Australian Uranium in Antarctic Ice ?
>
> Those same dusts, if they are from Roxby Downs (Olympic Dam), would also
> have elevated levels of copper, silver, & gold.
>
> Dan W McCarn
> 108 Sherwood Blvd
> Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA
> +1-505-670-8123
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 25, 2016, at 12:55, KARAM, PHILIP <PHILIP.KARAM at nypd.org> wrote:
> >
> > I guess one question to ask is how uranium is mined in Australia. If it's
> largely open-pit mines (or some other process that generates a lot of
> airborne dust) then it's certainly plausible. Ice cores from Greenland have
> been shown to have elevated lead concentrations in strata corresponding to
> the Roman Empire and are interpreted as reflecting the processing of lead
> ore and the use of lead by the Romans. And we know (as someone else
> mentioned earlier) that African dust has been tracked across the Atlantic,
> as has Chinese dust across the Pacific. So the thought that Australian dust
> might make its way to the Antarctic Peninsula is certainly reasonable - if
> the uranium is mined or processed in such a way that generates dust.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > P. Andrew Karam, PhD, CHP
> > NYPD Counterterrorism
> > One Police Plaza, Room 1109
> > New York, NY 10038
> > (718) 615-7055 (desk)
> > (646) 879-5268 (mobile)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> > [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jaro Franta
> > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:46 PM
> > To: 'The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
> List'
> > Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Australian Uranium in Antarctic Ice ?
> >
> > Or, to be precise, Uranium from Australian MINES is claimed to be found
> in
> Antarctic ice.
> >
> > What do you make of it ?
> >
> > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231016304423
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > My thoughts:
> >
> > Looking closely at a Radiometric Map of Australia (
> https://db.tt/pN8fmZNI
> ), I see that the region around Roxby Downs, the town next to Olympic Dam
> mine (producers of both uranium & copper) has a low surface concentration
> of
> uranium.
> > Certainly lower than the Flinders Ranges to the east, or other areas to
> the south.
> > That being the case, how can lead researcher Mariusz Potocki reasonably
> expect readers to believe his claim that uranium found in Antarctica comes
> from Australian uranium mines ?
> > Does he propose some sort of magical transport mechanism that avoids the
> regions where mines are located, going directly to Antarctica ?
> >
> > It seems that, if anything, the Uranium found in Antarctic ice must be
> > dust from the erosion of the Flinders Range and other large geological
> > features that standout in the Radiometric Map of Australia (
> > https://db.tt/pN8fmZNI )
> >
> > Is there similar experience elsewhere in the world, such as dust blowing
> off the Sahara desert, from U-loaded phosphate deposits ?
> > How much is from mining, and how much from general soil erosion ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Jaro Franta
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> > understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> > understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> > http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>


More information about the RadSafe mailing list