[ RadSafe ] *** SPAM *** Re: on-site versus vendor provided dosimetry

[Franz Schönhofer]

Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  James, I am since long retired, I had a small governmental
   laboratory with about six persons, handling 99% of the time very low-activities
   and mostly enviromental samples, but legislation required the usual surveillance.
   This was important to prove that even the "highly contaminated Chernobyl
  samples" did not cause any enhanced doses to us". [...] 

Content analysis details:   (5.7 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1    FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE        STOX_REPLY_TYPE
 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
                            [80.108.231.69 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [80.108.231.69 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 1.3 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines