[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Another Film Dosimeter Rumor & ANSI N13.11
There is another rumor out in the field, especially in the medical
institutions, stating that the new ANSI N13.11 Standard, that is
currently in the review process, will be changed whereby film
dosimeters will not be permitted to be used for dose of record
monitoring. The essence is, the standard with the new test categories
will be such that the film dosimeter will not be capable of passing
the Standard. This insinuation is totally false.
(1) The revision currently being reviewed does in fact add new test
categories. However, no specific dosimeter must be tested in all ANSI
N13.11 categories, simply because they are in the Standard. The
dosimeter need only be tested in the categroies for which the
processor requests to be accredited for.
(2) In a hospital, the types of radiation that must be monitored for
include most likely, x-ray and in nuclear medicine and therapy,
potentially gamma, beta (high and low energy) and possible mixtures
of gamma, beta and various x-ray energies. Again, if a facility needs
to monitor for these radiations, then the dosimeter must be tested.
The film badges today meet all of these NIST Beam Code tests. In the
future, if other NIST Beam Codes are added, the film may not be able
to detect some of the mixtures, specifically low energy beta and low
energy x-ray mixtures. However, the primary point that needs to be
fully understood is that the film does today and will tomorrow be
capable of detecting and accurately and precisely measuring and
reporting those fields currently used within the medical community.
(3) The new ANSI N13.11 Standard, as it now stands, will be difficult
in some proposed categories for all commercial dosimeters. Don't take
my word for it. Simply ask your current processor, be they in-house
or commercial, how their dosimeter and their algorithms will be able
to process under the proposed Standard, and what test data do they
have to support their statements. Do not accept rhetoric.
(4) The revised ANSI N13.11 Standard will not be out on the streets
for several years. NVLAP and DOELAP (which hopes to combine the
proficiency test requirements into one Standard with this revision)
implements a phased in approach. Even with the Standard in place, all
processors are allowed a phased in approach. The NRC and state
regulatory agencies also have a say as to what parts of the Standard
they will accept for dosimetry processing. An example is the 1993
Standard has a Co-60 test category. The NRC and States do not require
that this be tested in Category IV. Only Cs-137 is in the
requirement.
(5) Film dosimetry is the primary dosimeter used not only in the USA,
but worldwide (85% is film). This dosimeter will simply not go away
because of a Standard. That is NOT the intent of the ANSI N13.11
Committee.
In conclusion, I have also contacted Steve Sims (ORNL) the N13.11
Committee Chair, Mike Lantz (APS) working committee member and Paul
Martin (NVLAP) to address this rumor and put it to rest, once and for
all.
I have also asked Tosh Ushino (ICN Dosimetry) who is the Vice Chair
of the N13 Committee (the high level governing body) to address this
rumor at the N13 Committee Meeting being held on January 29 at the
Virginia Beach HOS Meeting.
Please make this post available to MedPhysics and other medically
oriented professional listservers.
Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Biomedicals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/scperle
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html