[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Response to Carver



Like the media would know the difference or even care.  Who would read an
article titled "Broken and left over non-radioactive parts of nuclear
weapons components are being reclaimed rather than being disposed of!".
That would rank right up there with "Hundreds of aircraft had uneventful
flights today."

Sarcasm just doesn't play as well over e-mail does it?


>Then, by definition, they would not be *weapons*....
>
>
>>>> CarverT@oro.doe.gov wrote on Fri 11 Feb 00  15:13 >>>
>
>Weapons were shipped to Paducah for reclamation of metal without the
>nuclear package.
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html


| | | |    Kim Merritt, RRPT
| | | |__  Physics Safety Support Officer
| | \___/  Lawrence Livermore National Labs
| \___/    merritt9@llnl.gov
\___/      Voice: (925)423-9668   Fax: (925)422-7160
	   "When the only tool you have is a hammer,
	   every problem begins to resemble a nail."
	   -Abraham Maslow
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html