Re: another intentional misuse (trivial risks)

["Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@hotmail.com>]

>>What should we say when the actual risk is trivial or non-existent?
>
>We need to define what the above means.
--------
I think that it wouldn't hurt if the ICRP could spent a few years on this. 
The death probability rates etc from 1990 could be a good starting point for 
discussing all sorts of death rate risks.

My personal opinion only,

Bjorn Cedervall     bcradsafers@hotmail.com

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html