Re: No subject given, protest

[Franz Schoenhofer <schoenho@via.at>]

At 10:44 13.03.2000 -0600, you wrote:
>     Dear Radsafe administrator,
>        I wopuld like to post the following message but have not been able 
>     to do so.  Please healp.
>     
>     SUBJECT:  Tokai fallout detection in Southern California
>     
>     We at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Clemente CA) have 
>     noted that the gross beta activity from our environmental particulate 
>     air samples is elevated for the collection period ending October 26, 
>     1999. The values average 6.4e-2 pci/m3.  This week has the highest 
>     average and the highest single gross beta reading since June 1986 when 
>     we were seeing fallout from Chernobyl.  The lag time from the 
>     Tokaimura accident (~ 3 weeks) is consistent with the fallout lag time 
>     from the Chinese weapons tests in the early 80's and from the 
>     Chernobyl accident.
>     Has another member seen elevated radiological enviornmental monitoring 
>     data from this time frame?  hansenna@songs.sce.com  Noel Hansen (949) 
>     368-8123

NO, No, No!!!!!!!!!!

Taking the "risk" to be again flamed over and over again I fully protest
against such an incredible message and the incredible conclusions of
drawing a parallel from TokaiMura to some gross-beta increase at some
station in the USA. Everybody who has the slightest idea about the Tokai
Mura accident, the order of magnitude of worst case release and the
dilution which would most probably result in less than one atom of a Tokai
Mura radionuclide per km3 in the USA should clearly protest against such an
interpretation. Is this interpretation intended for the mass media to be
cited and probably to appear personally in TV? Is this a case for
Greenpeace or similar groups in order to increase radiophobia? 

Even when not taking into account the more than questionable significance
of gross measurements the arbitrary attribution of these measurements to an
event not at all related to the measurement has to be refused. 

If I were a regulator or inspector involved with this NPP I would take very
serious actions to improve the quality of persons involved in environmental
surveillance at this NPP.

Franz
Franz Schoenhofer
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
Tel.: +43-1-495 53 08
Fax.: same number
mobile phone: +43-664-338 0 333
e-mail: schoenho@via.at


Office:
Hofrat Dr. Franz Schoenhofer
Bundeskanzleramt (Federal Chancellery), VI/8
Radetzkystr. 2
A-1031 Vienna
AUSTRIA

phone: -43-1-71172-4458
fax: -43-1-7122331

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html