[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conundrum
I should have gone to law school; I could get rich off of people like that.
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com
"LANNI, MARC" wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Having had some experience with requesting an individuals
> dose from DOE contractors on many occasions, I can tell you
> that the DOE approach and rules/regulations differ completely from
> what is used in the NPP arena. I have literally recieved
> a xerox of a sticky note with someones internal calculated
> dose written on it signed by an RSO from one of these
> contractors. I ended up re-performing the in-vitro samples
> because of the inability of the contractor to comprehend
> the importance of "legal dose" as it applies to the NRC regs
> and state guidelines.
> We are really comparing apples and oranges here..just keep
> in mind that there are completely different sets of rules...
>
> Just my experiences and opinions
>
> Marc
>
> > Marc Lanni <mailto: mlanni@entergy.com>
> > Grand Gulf Nuclear Station - Health Physicist
> > Entergy Operations
> > mlanni@entergy.com
> > Office: (601) 437-6572
> > Fax: (601) 437-6573
> > Pager: (601) 930-8904
> >
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William V Lipton [mailto:liptonw@dteenergy.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 9:15 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Conundrum
>
> No matter how complex the arrangements, all record transfers, with the
> possible
> exception of required regulatory reports, require the employee's consent.
> I
> am not familiar with DOE regs, but I'd have a hard time understanding how
> one
> organization can be held reponsible for controlling the exposure of an
> individual being monitored by a different organization. It seems advisable
> to
> administratively allocate dose limits among the different organizations to
> assure that no limit is exceeded.
>
> The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
> It's not about dose, it's about trust.
>
> Bill Lipton
> liptonw@dteenergy.com
>
> brackett@bright.net wrote: ...
>
> > Many DOE sites have multiple contractors and subcontractors, some with
> their
> > own HP departments. One company does not have a say in the "hiring" of
> > another company's employees although they may be working in their
> > facilities. An individual can go between various facilities in the course
> of
> > one day that are under the jurisdiction of different companies. Obviously
> he
> > can't request a
> > termination report each time he leaves the facility to go to another.
> >
> > ******************************
> > Elizabeth M. Brackett, CHP
> > Sr. Health Physicist
> > MJW Corporation, Inc.
> > (330) 644-3757
> > mailto:brackett@bright.net
> > ******************************
> > ************************************************************************
> > The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> > information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html