Re: background vs man-made emmissions

[Franz Schoenhofer <schoenho@via.at>]

At 10:42 01.05.2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Has anybody considered that it might be easier (and perhaps less
controversial as well, maybe that's why not) to perform Sr-89 / 90 analyses
on milk as the utilities and states do? (since this is the presumed
ingestion pathway). I've always felt that you perform your measurement as
close to the presumed "source" as possible ... that way you don't have to
back-calculate through assumed bioaccumulation factors.

Jim,

You are provoking the bad sides in me. You are absolutely correct. But what
would be the propaganda effect in measuring milk, precipitation and gaseous
and liquid emissions? 

Teeth of babies - what a great advertisment, what a wonderful emotion, what
a wonderful public relation to generate money for future actions!

Franz


Franz Schoenhofer
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
Austria
Tel.: +43-1-495 53 08
Fax.: same number
mobile phone: +43-664-338 0 333
e-mail: schoenho@via.at


Office:
Hofrat Dr. Franz Schoenhofer
Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management
Radiation Protection Department (BMLFUW I/8 U)
Radetzkystr. 2
A-1031 Vienna
AUSTRIA

phone: -43-1-71172-4458
fax: -43-1-7122331

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html