And ... you probably won't see Sr-89 either (at least WE haven't) ... and THAT wouldn't support their agenda either.
You picked up on the fact that I was asking a rhetorical question!
Jim Hardeman
Jim_Hardeman@mail.dnr.state.ga.us
>>> Thomas M Lashley <lashleyt@dteenergy.com> 5/1/2000 12:36:44 >>>
Jim, as you know, Sr-90 concentration in milk is decreasing over time in the US and including down wind from nuclear power plants. This data would not support the Tooth Fairy Project's agenda.
Tom Lashley
LashleyT@DTEenergy.com
Jim Hardeman wrote:
> Has anybody considered that it might be easier (and perhaps less controversial as well, maybe that's why not) to perform Sr-89 / 90 analyses on milk as the utilities and states do? (since this is the presumed ingestion pathway). I've always felt that you perform your measurement as close to the presumed "source" as possible ... that way you don't have to back-calculate through assumed bioaccumulation factors.
>
> Jim Hardeman
> Jim_Hardeman@mail.dnr.state.ga.us
>
> >>> "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@earthlink.net> 4/30/2000 12:59:27 >>>
> All plant emissions are documented and sampling is done not only
> by the utilities but by the states as well. The data demonstrates
> that the Sr-90 emissions are not the cause of the "equilibrium" that
> Norm refers to. Of course, no data to support the statement that
> the Sr-90 levels in teeth have remained constant for children born in
> the '80s and 90's has been provided.
>
> How do you discount the fact that these levels just might be what
> is expected in teeth? Still, Norm and others haven't provided any
> data that shows what the Sr-90 levels in teeth are for children who
> have never been near a power reactor in their entire lives. Why
> hasn't this data been put forth by the Tooth Fairy Project? The
> answer is because it shows that there is no statistical difference,
> and if those who believed in these theories saw the real data for
> what it proves, they may not follow the mandates of these groups
> who have an agenda of their own. So, give them what they think
> may keep them in line, and hide the data that disproves all of the
> fantasy theories.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
> Director, Technical Extension 2306
> ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division Fax:(714) 668-3149
> ICN Biomedicals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
> ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
> Costa Mesa, CA 92626
>
> Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/1205
> ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
> !
!
> !
> !
!
> !
> !
!
> !
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html