[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DuPont, Other Nuclear Contractors Sued for $100 Bln
DuPont, Other Nuclear Contractors Sued for $100 Bln
Spokane, Washington, July 11 (Bloomberg) -- DuPont Co.,
Lockheed Martin Corp. and other military contractors are being
sued for $100 billion by neighbors of a Washington state nuclear
bomb-making plant, who claim radioactive releases from the World
War II-era facility caused thyroid cancers and other illnesses.
The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Spokane seeks class- action
status for about 10,000 neighbors of the Hanford Nuclear
Reservation, a facility constructed as part of the ``Manhattan
Project'' to develop the atomic bomb.
The facility's operation was ``so reckless, wanton, intentional and
immoral as to compel a reasonable person in the community to
declare the same as atrocious, beyond decency, and utterly
intolerable in a civilized society so as to constitute outrageous
conduct,'' the suit says.
`I would like coverage for any future medical expenses,'' said
plaintiff Ann Tabasinski, who was born shortly after her father
moved his family to Richland, Washington, in the mid-1940s to
work at the plant as a physician.
Tabasinski said she may be at high risk for the kinds of cancers
and other illnesses that have already killed some family members.
``I should get some compensation if I should die early,'' she said,
adding that so far she has suffered no ill effects from living near the
plant.
The suit alleges the companies didn't run the plant safely and failed
to inform the public of the health risks. The suit names 22 causes
of action, including numerous constitutional violations, negligence,
trespassing on property through airborne radiation particles and
fraud.
DuPont, the lead defendant in the suit and operator of the Hanford
facility 1942 to 1946, had no immediate comment.
Riddled With Problems
Hanford has been riddled for years with problems and controversies
surrounding its storage and maintenance of radioactive wastes.
Recently, the U.S. Energy Department fined another defendant in
the suit, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, $100,000 for faulty welds in
pipes transferring toxic waste from an unstable underground tank
farm on the reservation. Corvallis, Oregon-based CH2M Hill, a unit
of CH2M Hill Companies Ltd., has a Energy Department contract
to move the waste.
Federal and state health officials are already conducting a study of
the potential impact that the Hanford facility has had on the health
of Richland residents and others living downwind of the plant.
Tabasinski said she contacted a lawyer after the government sent
her a questionnaire aimed at helping to determine a range of
radiation exposure.
Other defendants in the suit include General Electric Co.;
Westinghouse Hanford Co., now a subsidiary of British Energy Plc;
Fluor Daniel Hanford, now a unit of the IT Group Inc.; Boeing Co.,
which bought Rockwell International Corp.'s military and aerospace
business in 1996; and Atlantic Richfield Co., now a unit of BP
Amoco Plc.
Also named as defendants are UNC Nuclear Industries, Batelle
Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest Laboratory and Hanford
Environmental Health Foundation Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Biomedicals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html