[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Error Condition Re: Fwd: RE: Nuke Sites May Not Rid Contaminants
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: Error Condition Re: Fwd: RE: Nuke Sites May Not Rid Contaminants
- From: "Carmen M. Rodriguez" <carmenr@lanl.gov>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 13:11:05 -0600
- In-Reply-To: <200008081544.JAA22509@pobox1663.lanl.gov>
Help: I am subscribed and now that I resubscribed I am getting two copies
of every email. Something is wrong. Can you please help? Thanks, Carmen
At 10:49 AM 8/8/00 -0500, you wrote:
>carmenr@lanl.gov: You are not subscribed to radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu.
>Your message is returned to you unprocessed. If you want to subscribe,
>send mail to listserv@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu with the following request:
>
> subscribe RADSAFE Your Name
>
>In addition, the system found the following address(es) that resemble yours.
>If one of these is you, please resend your message from that one, or use the
>'set <list> address' request to change the address you are subscribed with:
>
>CARMENR@POBOX1663.LANL.GOV
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Hello: I received this email from you. Is there anyway to get a copy of
>this study by the National Academy of Sciences. How does one go about
>getting this copy? Please advise. Thanks, Carmen
>
>>> >Nuke Sites May Not Rid Contaminants
>>> >
>>> >WASHINGTON (AP) - More than two-thirds of the government sites
>>> >involved in decades of nuclear bomb production will never be
>>> >completely cleaned of contamination, according to a study by the
>>> >National Academy of Sciences.
>>> >
>>> >``Long-term stewardship will be required for over 100 of the 144
>>> >waste sites,'' said the report released Monday by a special panel
>>> >examining government plans to deal with this legacy of the Cold
>>> >War years.
>>> >
>>> >And the scientific panel warned that any plan for managing long-
>>> >term isolation of contaminated sites should anticipate problems
>>> >because the likelihood of the containment ``measures failing ... is
>>> >relatively high.''
>>> >
>>> >The sites are in 27 states and range from the massive Hanford
>>> >reservation in Washington state, where government reactors made
>>> >plutonium for the first nuclear bombs, to portions of the nation's
>>> >federal research labs such as Argonne in Illinois and Sandia in New
>>> >Mexico.
>>> >
>>> >The time for remediation of the sites, contaminated with radiation
>>> >and dangerous chemicals, range from several years to nearly 50
>>> >years. And for decades after that continued stewardship of many of
>>> >these sites will be required, the scientists said.
>>> >
>>> >Furthermore any plan for dealing with these sites must be flexible
>>> >with continued involvement by the federal government because ``the
>>> >likelihood that institutional management measure will fail at some
>>> >point is relatively high,'' said the report.
>>> >
>>> >The report was requested by the Energy Department as it develops
>>> >long-term strategies cleaning up materials that in some cases are
>>> >expected to remain dangerously radioactive for thousands of years.
>>> >
>>> >``The Academy did a good job at pointing out the many things we
>>> >have to look at,'' said Gerald Boyd, the department's deputy
>>> >assistant secretary for science and technology.
>>> >
>>> >Boyd said the department agrees that many of these sites cannot
>>> >be abandoned even after the contamination is clearly contained.
>>> >
>>> >``We can't walk away from these sites. We can't turn our backs to
>>> >them. That's what they (the Academy) are recommending to us
>>> >and that's what we're planning to do.''
>>> >
>>> >While some areas likely will never be clean enough to be used,
>>> >other areas - or parts of facilities - are expected to be cleaned
>>> >sufficiently of contamination for restricted uses, the scientists said.
>>> >
>>> >The DOE strategy involves two stages: first containment of the
>>> >contamination and remediation, a process already underway.
>>> >Secondly, long-term ``stewardship'' of sites where residual
>>> >contamination will be left for the foreseeable future, perhaps
>>> >always.
>>> >
>>> >But such long-term management is full of uncertainties, the report
>>> >said.
>>> >
>>> >``At many sites future risk from residual wastes cannot be
>>> >predicted with any confidence because numerous underlying
>>> >factors that influence the character, extent and severity of long-
>>> >term risks are not well understood,'' said the report.
>>> >
>>> >Thomas Leschine of the University of Washington, chairman of the
>>> >committee that wrote the report, said that as a result the
>>> >government model for long-term stewardship of these sites must be
>>> >flexible and anticipate failure.
>>> >
>>> >``Understanding this and developing a highly reliable organizational
>>> >model that anticipates failure while taking advantage of new
>>> >opportunities for further remediation and isolation of contaminants
>>> >remains a significant challenge for DOE,'' said Leschine.
>>> >
>>> >Mary English, a researcher at the University of Tennessee-
>>> >Knoxville, and the committee's vice chair, said that any plans for
>>> >these sites ``will need to be periodically revisited'' because of
>>> >changing conditions and new technological developments.
>>> >
>>> >The Energy Department must ``acknowledge gaps'' in its technical
>>> >capabilities today as they would be used to contain and isolate
>>> >radioactive wastes hundreds of years into the future, the study said.
>>> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> >Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800)
>>> 548-5100
>>> >Director, Technical Extension 2306
>>>
>>> >ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Division Fax:(714) 668-3149
>>>
>>> >ICN Biomedicals, Inc. E-Mail:
>>> sandyfl@earthlink.net
>>>
>>> >ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
>>>
>>> >Costa Mesa, CA 92626
>>> >
>>> >Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/1205
>>> >ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
>>> >************************************************************************
>>> >The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>>> >information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
>Carmen M. Rodriguez, Communications and Outreach Team
>Environmental Restoration Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory
>1900 Diamond Drive, Pueblo Complex Room 104E, MS M992, Los Alamos, NM 87545
>Phone at work: (505) 665-6770 Phone at home: (505) 662-7044
>Fax telephone: (505) 665-7369 Email address: carmenr@lanl.gov
>
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
Carmen M. Rodriguez, Communications and Outreach Team
Environmental Restoration Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory
1900 Diamond Drive, Pueblo Complex Room 104E, MS M992, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Phone at work: (505) 665-6770 Phone at home: (505) 662-7044
Fax telephone: (505) 665-7369 Email address: carmenr@lanl.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html