RE: Two discussion groups?

["Neil, David M" <neildm@id.doe.gov>]

Nice idea, but I bet they couldn't be separated.

Dave Neil		neildm@id.doe.gov

		Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Steve Frantz [SMTP:sfrantz@yahoo.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, August 10, 2000 4:12 PM
> To:	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:	Two discussion groups?
> 
> ---someone wrote---
> ... when I signed up for RADSAFE ... it was a forum
> for Health Physicists to exchange ideas and scientific
> information, but it is becoming more and more a
> mouthpiece for [people] to vent ..., and it's taking
> up an increasing amount of bandwidth and time. I'm
> very near the point of unsubscribing to RADSAFE as
> it's become primarily a waste of time. 
> ---end quote---
> 
> I agree.  We spend too much time arguing and too
> little time in technical discussion. Perhaps we need
> TWO discussion boards, one technical and the other
> political/philosophical.
> 
> Stephen G. Frantz, P.E., CHP
> Director, Reed College Reactor
> 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
> Portland, Oregon 97202-8199
> 503 777-7222
> fax: 503 777-7274
> mailto: reactor@reed.edu
> http://web.reed.edu/resources/reactor
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com/
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html