[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What Should We Do With Plutonium Once Nuclear Weapons Are
A similar list could be posted for NRC, EPA, or state actions against
private companies. Who is going to do the work if this is your criteria?
Mike
At 09:55 AM 8/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:35:12 EDT
>From: Pambo1@aol.com
>Subject: Re: What Should We Do With Plutonium Once Nuclear Weapons Are
>
>Okay, Ruth, below I've got links to some "specific evidence" that makes me
>doubt whether DOE and its contractors can be trusted. These are all DOE
>web sites, and I've even thrown in a couple of university-related items
>(University of California and University of Missouri).
>
>Yes, I'm quite aware that DOE has contracts with universities. Would you
>elaborate on how those are different from the others?
>
>Pam Watson
>DOE subcontractor worker
>Oak Ridge, TN
>
>Examples:
>
>DOE fines Univ. of California for workers' radiation exposure at Livermore
>(March 1998):
>
>http://www.doe.gov/news/releases98/marpr/pr98028.htm
Rest of list snipped.
__________________________
Michael C. Baker
Environmental Technology Group
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Mail Stop J594
Los Alamos, NM 87545
mcbaker@lanl.gov
(505) 667-7334 (phone)
(505) 665-8346 (fax)
(505) 996-3519 (pager)
__________________________
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html