[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What Should We Do With Plutonium Once Nuclear Weapons Are




A similar list could be posted for NRC, EPA, or state actions against 
private companies.  Who is going to do the work if this is your criteria?

Mike


At 09:55 AM 8/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:35:12 EDT
>From: Pambo1@aol.com
>Subject: Re: What Should We Do With Plutonium Once Nuclear Weapons Are
>
>Okay, Ruth, below I've got links to some "specific evidence" that makes me 
>doubt whether DOE and its contractors can be trusted.  These are all DOE 
>web sites, and I've even thrown in a couple of university-related items 
>(University of California and University of Missouri).
>
>Yes, I'm quite aware that DOE has contracts with universities.  Would you 
>elaborate on how those are different from the others?
>
>Pam Watson
>DOE subcontractor worker
>Oak Ridge, TN
>
>Examples:
>
>DOE fines Univ. of California for workers' radiation exposure at Livermore 
>(March 1998):
>
>http://www.doe.gov/news/releases98/marpr/pr98028.htm

Rest of list snipped.

__________________________
Michael C. Baker

Environmental Technology Group
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Mail Stop J594
Los Alamos, NM 87545

mcbaker@lanl.gov

(505) 667-7334 (phone)
(505) 665-8346 (fax)
(505) 996-3519 (pager)
__________________________


************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html