Re: Junk Physics? More on Blacklight Power

["Joseph W. Moon" <jwmoon@attglobal.net>]

Can anyone refute this work?
<http://www.blacklightpower.com/>

At 04:30 PM 8/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Two items for your Friday afternoon amusement from:
>WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 18 Aug 00   Washington, DC
>
>BLACKLIGHT: SUIT AGAINST THE PATENT OFFICE FAILS.  BlackLight
>Power's plans to go public with an estimated $1B stock offering
>are presumably on hold.  You may recall that on 15 Feb BLP was
>awarded a patent on a process for putting hydrogen atoms into a
>"state below the ground state," shrinking them into teeny little
>things called "hydrinos" (WN 18 Feb 00).  A second patent dealing
>with hydrino chemistry was set for issuance two weeks later.  But
>on 17 Feb the Patent Office withdrew the second patent, and
>opened up the first for reexamination.  One patent official was
>concerned that the BLP technology involves perpetual motion and
>"cold fusion."  With its intellectual property somewhere in
>patent purgatory, BlackLight filed suit in Federal Court against
>the Commissioner of Patents.  Tuesday, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled
>the Patent Office action was "neither arbitrary nor capricious." 
>

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html