[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Criteria used to protect nuclear materials from fire
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AC8B.051DE210
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
In the most recent issue of Fire Engineering Jim Hutton of DOE wrote that
the criteria used to test overpacks and UF6 cylinder shipments 1475oF for 30
minutes is not reflective of a fuel fire in a transportation accident. He
also states that all UF6 shipments should be provided with protective
overpakes.
I am a Radiological Officer and an Emergency Responder . My primary duties
are planning for responding to and training others to respond to accidents
involving nuclear materials. In May I will be conducting a series of grant
funded training programs on response to transportation accidents involving
of DOE shipments of radioactive materials.
Could RADSAF members clarify this for me. Is this an issue, significant
concern, with respect to response, responder safety and responder actions?
What do I tell my students who for all of my career I have been telling that
these shipments are safe?
I have a concern that the fear that responders have about radiation and
radioactivity, based on this article will lead to a self fulfilling prophecy
in that they would respond to an accident involving fire like the new fuel
fire in Massachusetts, and cause a problem with one of these shipments.
I'm especially concerned about the UF6 because of its chemical hazards and
the Gore Oklahoma incident.
Thanks in advance.
Tony Gaglierd RO, EMT
Allegheny County Emergency Services
tgaglierd@achd.net
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AC8B.051DE210
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Criteria used to protect nuclear materials from fire</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">In the most recent issue of Fire =
Engineering Jim Hutton of DOE wrote that the criteria used to test =
overpacks and UF6 cylinder shipments 1475oF for 30 minutes is not =
reflective of a fuel fire in a transportation accident. He also states =
that all UF6 shipments should be provided with protective =
overpakes.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I am a Radiological Officer and an =
Emergency Responder . My primary duties are planning for responding to =
and training others to respond to accidents involving nuclear =
materials. In May I will be conducting a series of grant funded =
training programs on response to transportation accidents involving of =
DOE shipments of radioactive materials.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Could RADSAF members clarify this for =
me. Is this an issue, significant concern, with respect to response, =
responder safety and responder actions? What do I tell my students who =
for all of my career I have been telling that these shipments are safe? =
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I have a concern that the fear that =
responders have about radiation and radioactivity, based on this =
article will lead to a self fulfilling prophecy in that they would =
respond to an accident involving fire like the new fuel fire in =
Massachusetts, and cause a problem with one of these =
shipments.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I'm especially concerned about the UF6 =
because of its chemical hazards and the Gore Oklahoma incident.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Thanks in advance.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Tony Gaglierd RO, EMT</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Allegheny County Emergency =
Services</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">tgaglierd@achd.net</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AC8B.051DE210--
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
------------------------------