[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Nuclear solution to California power crisis urged
Another uninformed journalist inserts his limited view as "fact"
inconspicuously tacked on to the quotes of others. No one seems to remember
the heated debate on closing Rancho Seco in the late 1980's when
Californians decreed that they did not need the power supplied by that
plant. In addition to counting all reactors at a site (e.g., 3 built at San
Onofre, 2 at Diablo Canyon) as a single "generator" (while the contrasted 25
was the number of planned reactors), his indication that "Only two were
built..." ignores Rancho Seco and Humboldt Bay, as well, conveniently
overlooked!
The power shortage is a result of multiple factors, but lack of base
capacity is largely on the account of anti-nuclear detractors.
Bob Hearn
rah@america.net
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Sandy Perle
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:38 PM
To: nuclear news list
Subject: US POWER - Greens, industry at times embrace in energy crisis
Nuclear solution to California power crisis urged
(ENN) April 1, 2001, To end California's electricity shortage, the
state should build a nuclear power plant to run pumps that bring
Sierra-fed water to Southern California, an Inland lawmaker said
Thursday.
"It's time to revisit nuclear," said Assemblyman Bill Leonard, R-San
Bernardino. He said nuclear power is clean and affordable.
The nuclear plant would be only the third built in the state and the
first to be publicly owned and operated.
.
.
.
At one time, privately owned electric utilities planned to build 25
nuclear generators along California's coast, said former state Energy
Commission member Gene Varanini.
Only two were built, including the San Onofre plant near San
Clemente, of which Southern California Edison is majority owner and
Riverside has a small stake. The other is Pacific Gas & Eectric's
Diablo Canyon reactor in San Luis Obispo County.
The law Leonard wants to suspend says the state should not license
additional nuclear power plants until the federal Nuclear Regulatory
America’s deepening energy troubles,” according to the Industry