[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

France overturns ruling on Australian n-waste



Index:



France overturns ruling on Australian n-waste

Kashiwazaki mayor seeks Fukushima's explanation of MOX use

Japan's nuke accident operater settles lawsuits

Japan nuclear body says inflated budget request

Nuclear body defrauded gov't by padding workforce

Energy Department Reviews Uranium

=================================



France overturns ruling on Australian n-waste

  

PARIS, April 3 (Reuters) - France's state-owned nuclear reprocessing 

company Cogema said it would start unloading a cargo of spent fuel 

rods from Australia on Tuesday after winning an appeal against an 

injunction. 



A court of appeal in the Normandy town of Caen overturned the 

injunction, which the environmental group Greenpeace had obtained 

from a lower court on March 15, a Cogema statement said. 



The injunction had prevented Cogema from unloading and reprocessing 

360 spent nuclear fuel rods at the port of Cherbourg from the 

container ship Le Bouguenais. 



"Unloading of the Bouguenais...will be carried out today. The spent 

fuel rods will be transferred to the Cogema plant in La Hague for 

reprocessing," Cogema said in the statement. 



The injunction had placed in doubt the future of Australia's High 

Flux Australian Reactor (HIFAR) at Lucas Heights in Sydney, run by 

nuclear reactor operator Australian Nuclear Science and Technology 

Organisation (ANSTO) 



In Canberra, Australian Science and Resources Minister Nick Minchin 

welcomed the Caen court's ruling. 



"This decision will allow ANTSO to proceed with its policy of 

sensibly managing fuel rods from the HIFAR reactor through 

reprocessing in France," Minchin said in a statement. 



Greenpeace had argued that Cogema did not have proper authorisation 

to take the waste. 



Cogema said the Caen court had rejected that argument and ruled that 

the lower court had not been competent to judge the matter. 



Greenpeace said it planned to return to court to try again to block 

the reprocessing operation. 

---------------



Kashiwazaki mayor seeks Fukushima's explanation of MOX use



NIIGATA, Japan, April 3 (Kyodo) - The mayor of Kashiwazaki in Niigata 

Prefecture, which hosts a nuclear power plant operated by Tokyo 

Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), demanded Tuesday that Fukushima 

Prefecture explain its plan to reject the use of plutonium-uranium 

mixed oxide (MOX) fuel at a TEPCO nuclear plant there. 



Kashiwazaki Mayor Masazumi Saikawa said Fukushima Gov. Eisaku Sato 

should provide a full explanation as soon as possible of his plan not 

to allow the use of MOX fuel, as it could affect state nuclear 

policy. 



TEPCO's Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant was scheduled to become 

the first nuclear plant to use MOX fuel in Japan in April. However, 

Sato said in February that the northeastern Japan prefecture will not 

allow MOX use at the plant for the time being on the grounds that 

residents are against it. 



Sato's rejection is also believed to be connected with TEPCO's 

announcement in early February to freeze its plan to build new 

reactors at a thermal power plant in the town of Hirono in the 

prefecture, which would result in loss of tax revenues for the local 

municipality. 



MOX fuel has already been shipped to TEPCO's Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant 

on the Sea of Japan, but Niigata Prefecture is reluctant to host the 

nation's first ''pluthermal'' process involving MOX fuel. 



The process consists of using MOX fuel -- made by mixing uranium with 

plutonium chemically extracted from spent nuclear fuel -- in a 

thermal reactor. 



''If Fukushima is calling for a major change (in nuclear policy) 

without offering sufficient explanation, we will be in trouble,'' 

Saikawa said. 



Saikawa also criticized Sato's plan of taking time to study a nuclear 

fuel cycle policy. 



The electric power industry plans to carry out the ''pluthermal'' 

project in 16 to 18 reactors by 2010. Originally, the project was 

scheduled to be launched in 1999. 

-------------



Japan's nuke accident operater settles lawsuits

  

TOKYO, April 3 (Reuters) - The operator of Japan's worst nuclear 

accident site said on Tuesday it had agreed to pay about 14.48 

billion yen ($114.4 million) in compensation to settle around 7,000 

lawsuits filed by residents, Kyodo News Agency said. 



The world's second-worst accident since Chernobyl in 1986, occurred 

in 1999 when three workers at a plant privately operated by JCO Co 

Ltd set off an uncontrolled nuclear reaction which killed two of the 

workers and seriously injured one. 



At least 439 people in the Tokaimura area about 140 km (90 miles) 

northeast of Tokyo were exposed to radiation. 



The operator said it settled 98.9 percent of the cases filed against 

them as of late last month and estimated that about 75 suits were 

still unsettled, Kyodo said. 



Last September, Tokaimura residents handed the government a petition 

with 22,500 signatures seeking more compensation and support beyond 

the initial 12.66 billion yen ($99.99 million) that JCO agreed to pay 

to settle the cases from the accident. 

---------------



Japan nuclear body says inflated budget request

  

TOKYO, April 3 (Reuters) - A nuclear plant operator funded by the 

Japanese government said on Tuesday it had falsified payroll details 

in a budget request for fiscal 1999/2000 to hike older workers' 

salaries by a combined 1.19 billion yen ($9.4 million). 



A spokesman for Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC) said 

it had asked for funds to cover wages for a staff of 2,676 -- 139 

more than were actually employed -- and had been allocated about 23 

billion yen. 



It should have received about 21.81 billion yen for wages. 



The spokesman said the extra money was paid to JNC's older employees.



The institute will release a report on the matter after conducting an 

internal investigation, he said. 



Nobutaka Machimura, minister of education, culture, sports, science 

and technology, told a news conference on Tuesday that he had asked 

JNC to conduct an investigation as quickly as possible. 



JNC's budget for the fiscal year ending in March 2000 totalled about 

165.6 billion yen, of which about 125.7 billion yen was earmarked for 

research and related expenses. 



JNC was launched in 1998 after its predecessor -- the Power Reactor 

and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp (PNC) -- came under fire for 

mismanagement of its various nuclear facilities. 



JNC has taken over many of PNC's nuclear research and development 

projects, including the operation of a prototypical fast-breeder 

reactor, Monju. 



Located in Fukui prefecture, west of Tokyo, Monju has been closed 

since December 1995, when it leaked a massive amount of sodium 

coolant. 



The local government is currently studying a request submitted by JNC 

last December to be allowed to reopen the plant, the spokesman said. 



Monju must also clear central government safety checks before it can 

be reopened. 

--------------



Nuclear body defrauded gov't by padding workforce



MITO, Japan, April 3 (Kyodo) - 



The governmental Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute claimed an 

excessive amount of personnel expenses by padding the number of its 

employees in a report to the government, foundation officials said 

Tuesday. 



The institute, a foundation of the Education, Sports, Science and 

Technology Ministry, reported in fiscal 1999 that it had a workforce 

of 2,676, 139 more than actual number of 2,537, and used the excess 

money to increase the salary of each employee, the officials said, 

confirming a report in the Asahi Shimbun the same day. 



Based on the reported number of officials, the institute was 

allocated 23 billion yen for personnel expenses in fiscal 1999, and 

on average about 500,000 yen extra was paid to each of its employees, 

the officials said, adding that the institute is doing the same this 

year. 



The press office of the institute, based in the village of Tokaimura, 

Ibaraki Prefecture, northeast of Tokyo, said the foundation's salary 

fund would run short if it reported the actual number of employees to 

the government. 



It said the government calculation of salary allotments for 

foundations is based solely on the number of employees, and the 

institute, which has many older officials, would not have enough 

financial resources to pay their salaries. 



The press office said the institute will investigate the details of 

the case. 



Commenting on the scandal, Education, Sports, Science and Technology 

Minister Nobutaka Machimura told a press conference that budgetary 

management and the quota of employees are within the discretion of 

the institute. 



''I have ordered ministry officials to carry out an inspection and 

report the results within two weeks,'' he said. 



The Asahi Shimbun said the institute has kept dual account books and 

pooled illicitly obtained funds for the past 20 years. 



The newspaper said the foundation pooled at least 25.4 billion yen 

under the heading ''adjustment expenses'' in the past five years. 

Part of the money was paid to the foundation's officials, effectively 

padding their salaries, the daily said. 



According to the Asahi, the foundation's budget covers an operating 

division, which deals with the development of the prototype fast-

breeder reactor Monju in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, and a clerical 

division. 



In the institute's fiscal 2000 budget, 125.7 billion yen was 

allocated to the operating division and 39.9 billion yen to the 

clerical division, the newspaper said. The government finances the 

institute's budget and any flow of money between the two divisions is 

prohibited. 



But the institute saved 5% of each of several classified expenditures 

in the operating division's budget as ''in-house adjustment 

expenses,'' the Asahi said, quoting sources close to the case. 



The daily said the institute made a secret budget-implementation 

document in addition to the official budgetary document submitted to 

the government. 



Of the institute's fiscal 1999 budget, 850 million yen went to 

personnel costs, the daily said. The institute received from the 

government 23 billion yen for personnel costs for the falsely claimed 

2,676 employees in the clerical division. 



But the 23 billion yen was in fact shared among the 2,537 actual 

employees, thereby boosting each worker's salary. The institute then 

diverted money from the operating division to pay the salaries of 

some officials not covered by the personnel funds of the clerical 

division, the Asahi said. 



The institute began the manipulations more than 20 years ago, 

according to the daily. 

--------------



Energy Department Reviews Uranium



WASHINGTON (AP) Mar 30 - The Energy Department says it could take two 

more years to determine how much recycled uranium - which contains 

traces of plutonium and other radioactive materials - passed through 

its nuclear facilities. 



The agency released a preliminary review Thursday analyzing the flow 

of recycled uranium throughout the DOE sites between 1952 and 1999. 

The agency was unable to complete a final analysis due to 

``significant inconsistency and inherent uncertainty'' in the data it 

gathered from 12 facilities at nine sites. 



The investigation began in 1999, prompted by concerns that workers 

were unknowingly exposed to high levels of radiation at uranium 

enrichment plants in Paducah, Ky.; Piketon, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, 

Tenn. 



The Energy Department used uranium in nuclear weapons and as fuel for 

reactors. The agency began recycling it in the early 1950s to reduce 

U.S. dependence on foreign uranium. The report said most Energy 

Department facilities stopped using recycled uranium in the late 

1960s. 



Recycled uranium is more harmful than mined uranium because it has 

been processed in a reactor, where it becomes contaminated with 

plutonium and neptunium. 



Pete Dessaules, a team leader in DOE's Office of Plutonium, Uranium 

and Special Materials Inventory, said an overall assessment of the 12 

facilities will help determine exactly how much recycled uranium was 

used over the years and how much may still be stored around the 

country. 



However, the task is proving more difficult than expected, Dessaules 

said. 



``The biggest challenge in completing the report is standardizing the 

definitions that were used in the site reports for recycled 

uranium,'' he said. ``That may involve looking at millions of 

records.'' 



According to DOE, recycled uranium was present at the following 

locations: Hanford, Wash.; Savannah River, S.C.; Idaho National 

Engineering and Environmental Lab, Idaho; Fernald, Ohio; West Valley, 

N.Y.; Weldon Springs, Mo.; RMI Inc., Ohio; the gaseous diffusion 

plants in Paducah, Piketon and Oak Ridge; the Y-12 Plant in Oak 

Ridge; and Rocky Flats, Colo. 



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle					Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   				    	

Director, Technical				Extension 2306 				     	

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service		Fax:(714) 668-3149 	                   		    

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.			E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net 				                           

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  		E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com          	          

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.