Re: ENN news article

["Vadim Moskvin" <vmoskvin@RADONC.uh.iupui.edu>]

> Colleagues  

> 

> Maybe "CO2-free", but this sort of "emissions-free" rhetoric is what keeps getting us in a crack when there's a minor incident, such as IP2, when spokespersons have to explain that yes, there was a r> 

> Why do we keep shooting ourselves in the foot this way?

> 



There are three statements:



1. Amount of radioactive nuclei emission with ash and smoke from one

TPP on coil exceed pollution from one NPP.  2. Oil and gas resources

are not so large as we would like to hope (just 15 years for whole

World) 3. Nuclear Energy may and will be safe: 



http://www.nea.fr/html/nsd/docs/



Also



http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Books/2001Pubs/nrsnpp2001.shtml

http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Documents/Anrep/Anrep99/               

(Annual report. Topic: Safety)  



and



http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/standard/std0100t/std0100t.pdf



Regards



Vadim Moskvin





> My $0.02 worth ...

> 

> Jim Hardeman

> Jim_Hardeman@mail.dnr.state.ga.us

> 

> >>> "Thomas J Savin " <tjsav@LYCOS.COM> 4/19/2001 8:19:11 >>>

> The administration touts nuclear energy as emission-free. 

> 

> 

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/