[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Precautionary Principle

To: <RuthWeiner@AOL.COM>, <magna1@jps.net>, <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Subject: Re: The Precautionary Principle
From: "Jerry Cohen" <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:39:00 -0700
Organization: Prodigy Internet
References: <76.9f3d061.281a11a9@aol.com>
Reply-To: "Jerry Cohen" <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

In the case of low-dose radiation exposure, there is a more

fundamental question. Which side is caution on?

----- Original Message -----

From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM

To: magna1@jps.net ; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 5:04 PM

Subject: Re: The Precautionary Principle

the question is not whether or not to err on the side of caution, but by how
much.

Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Precautionary Principle
  - From: "Fritz A. Seiler" <faseiler@NMIA.COM>

References:
- Re: The Precautionary Principle
  - From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM

Prev by Date: Re:Chernobyl " population will continue to slide toward extinction "
Next by Date: guards at the Hanford: Union Opposes Hanford Security Change
Prev by thread: Re: The Precautionary Principle
Next by thread: Re: The Precautionary Principle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread