RE: So, is reprocessing in America's future?

["Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>]

How does the statement you made below which you made on 7/7 square with the

statement you made on 7/8, which is given still later?  Was a study done or

not?  

If so, please cite it.  If not, stop giving us conjecture.



-- John



John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist 

3050 Traymore Lane

Bowie, MD  20715-2024



E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)      





Ted said on 7/7:

. . .

Does everybody realize that 10,000 people (or more) have been living in

apartments in Taiwan where Co-60 in the rebar has been giving them up to 100

rad?  This has been going on for more than a decade, and they can't even get

people to move out.  The cancer rate is way below normal.  So nobody in

authority will talk about it.  They don't want to endanger all the money

going to study stuff like the horrors of low-dose radiation and the dangers

of proliferation.



Ted said on 7/8. . .



I personally handed the Taiwanese "ambassador" an RSH letter at a dinner at

his residence, asking for this information.  I also asked for assistance

from the man who was head of the Taiwanese AEC at the time and now lives in

Maryland (whom I had met previously).  They tried, but were unsuccessful.

There is little doubt about the approximate doses and about the cancer

cases.  So the conclusion is clear.  But we have no demographic data on age,

sex, etc of the population, so the info does not fully meet scientific

journal standards.

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.