[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lab equipment for drinking water testing
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Hudson, Scott A Mr CHPPMEUR <Scott.Hudson@CPE.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL>
An: 'radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu' <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Datum: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 15:56
Betreff: lab equipment for drinking water testing
>Hello esteemed Radsafers:
>
>I'm posting a request for someone who works in one of our labs:
>
>What equipment are people using to count radionuclides in drinking water,
to
>comply with EPA requirements? Brand names, software, suggestions and
>opinions are welcomed. I expect mostly liquid scintillation systems, but
>descriptions of other techniques are invited, too.
Scott,
I do not have the new US regulations at hand, because I do my RADSAFE
activities from my computer at home, but I sure am not mistaken, that there
was not too much change from the previous ones and that it still is the
question of gross-radioactivity measurements and a gross-radium value as
well as uranium.
I have done drinking water surveillance in Austria for many years and we
measured thousands of samples. We used the "Quantulus", ultra low-level
liquid scintillation spectrometer, which due to its extremely low background
enabled us to use very simple methods, which I partially developed and which
cause extremely low costs for chemicals and personnel. For gross alpha+beta
activity we achieved by simply mixing 8 ml of sample with 12 ml of a
carefully selected cocktail an LLD of about 0.7 Bq/l. I give LLDs based on 3
sigma of the background and 500 min counting time. Any elevated activities
of betas or alphas can be detected by inspecting the spectra provided by the
spectrometer. Additionally we determined Ra-226 with another similarily
simple method and using alpha-beta discrimination, achieving an LLD of less
than 30 mBq/l. Recently I have worked out with a collegue a very simple
method for the simultaneous determination of Ra-226, Ra-224, Ra-228 and
Pb-210 by liquid scintillation spectrometry. I presented it last October at
the BAER-meeting in Seattle and a paper is in press in 'Radioactivity and
Radiochemistry'.
The methods we used work only with the "Quantulus" with its extremely low
background. The simplicity of the methods, the saving of costs for
chemicals, personell and time more than compensate the maybe somewhat higher
costs of the instrument compared with conventional equipment.
If you need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Franz
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.