Re: Vote Amory Lovins' "energy survey"

[Paul William Shafer <paulwilliam_s@YAHOO.COM>]

Jim:



Looks like they want a mix of nuclear, wind and

solar...which makes tremendous sense.  Since they are

all non-chemical they should be located at the same

sites.  



However, this is not (currently) the way the

electrical industry, the NG suppliers/distributors

(XTO, El Paso, Nicor, Nipsco et. al.) nor the

electrical turbine + generation equipment suppliers

(GE, Seimens et. al) are going. 



There is less profit/earnings in nuclear, solar and

wind than NG, oil or coal.  Therefore, who do you

think will win, Wall Street or Amory Lovins and the

Rocky Mountain Institute?



Paul Shafer

--- Muckerheide <muckerheide@MEDIAONE.NET> wrote:

> > For Amory Lovins fans, vote on his Rocky Mountain

> Institute web page.

> > (http://www.rmi.org <http://www.rmi.org/>) [Page

> down, on right.]

> > 

> > "Which of the following energy sources should be

> the top priority for

> > government investments?"

> > 

> > Totals at midday:

> > Total Votes: 269 oil and gas 1%

> > nuclear power 14%

> > clean-coal tech 2%

> > energy efficiency 24%

> > renewable energy 45%

> > hydrogen 14%

> > 

> > Just now:  Nuclear 26%, Renewables 39%, Efficiency

> 20%

> > 

> > Tell your friends.

> > 

> > Regards, Jim

> > ===========

> 

>

************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put

> the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line.

> 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.