[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Nuclear Waste Really Does Have A Home"
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: RuthWeiner@aol.com <RuthWeiner@aol.com>
An: franz.schoenhofer@chello.at <franz.schoenhofer@chello.at>;
ograabe@ucdavis.edu <ograabe@ucdavis.edu>; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
<radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>; powernet@hps1.org <powernet@hps1.org>
Datum: Samstag, 28. Juli 2001 00:34
Betreff: Re: "Nuclear Waste Really Does Have A Home"
>To answer Franz's question and at the risk of boring everyone to death,
You did not bore me, rather I would like to go into more detail. Do you have
any references, where I could download the relevant regulations?
Thank you for your effort.
Franz
here
>is the spent fuel situation:
>
>In 1982, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act was enacted into law. It is the law
>today. It provides for the investigation of three mined geologic disposal
>sites for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste (the
>first-cycle waste from reprocessing). In 1987, the Act was amended to look
>at one site first -- Yucca Mountain. The Act requires DOE to construct
the
>facility and the NRC to license it to standards set by the EPA. The Act
also
>requires DOE to take tietle to commersial spent fuel. It is all funded by
>the Nuclear Waste Fund -- a one mil/kw tax on nuclear utilities -- from
which
>money is dispenses annually by Congress. That's a brief overview, with a
lot
>of detail left out, but until that Act ir repealed or amended, that's what
is
>planned. The Act does not prohibit reprocessing for commercial use.
>
>There is nothing prohibiting surface storage, and in fact there is on-site
>surface storage of SNF at some Us nuclear plants. there is also a proposal
>for a surface storage facility, by the Skull Mountain Goshute tribe in
Utah.;
> Such a private storage facility, like all non-federal US nuclear
facilities,
>would be licensed by the NRC.
>
>Mined geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste was proposed by the
>US geologic Survey in 1979 (Circular 779) and the proposal is still a good
>one.
>
>Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
>ruthweiner@aol.com
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.