[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Medical RF Imaging
I recall reading an article about 5(?) years ago regarding microwave
imaging of human body for contrabands. The imaging was done using microwave
emitted by human body. The image accompanying the article was low
resolution (compared to x-ray images) but a pistol can be clearly observed.
There was also a discussion of invasion of privacy issue in the article. I
don't recall if the article mentioned the wavelength of microwave emitted
by human body through electrical activity in neurons and muscles. I do
recall that my thoughts when I read the article were: 1) Hey, something
like Starship Enterprise technology to locate humanoids on planet surface
from space; and 2) I wonder if we can image neuromuscular activity in human
body directly? We might be to easily pinpoint problem areas.
Perhaps someone is already working on it. If anyone knows the status of
this technology, I would appreciate it if you can give me an update. Thanks
in advance.
________________________________
Toshihide "Tosh" Ushino, CHP
ICN Dosimetry (800) 548-5100 x2413
Gary Isenhower
<garyi@BCM.TMC.EDU> To: radsafe <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent by: cc:
owner-radsafe@list.vand Subject: Re: Medical RF Imaging
erbilt.edu
07/30/01 01:37 AM
Please respond to Gary
Isenhower
Thanks to everyone who responded to my question. I got several "Ever
heard of MRI?" messages. I should have explicitly said that I am very
familiar with MRI, even know something about the quantum mechanics
involved :)
I posed the question because MRI is very expensive and requires a huge
magnet. I was thinking, wouldn't it be nice if there was a cheap,
portable RF imaging device. In college I participated in some research
that sought to use RF transmission thru tissue to determine glucose
levels in the blood ( for diabetics). I believe that device is now
widely available.
I imagined something like a computed tomography scanner that could
measure RF transmission, then use filtered back projection to
reconstruct an image. Even if only say 2-10% transmission is detected,
that should be plenty to determine absorption coefficients. I
"fantasized" that such could be made as small as (or smaller than) some
of the new mini c-arms that have become popular recently
So far, I have heard no solid reason why its impossible. Perhaps I will
invent it and become a "biased corporate interest". Then I could
completely reverse my position on radiation safety and urge the public
to shun harmful radiation in favor of my all-natural imaging technology.
;)
_______________________________________________
Gary Isenhower
713-798-8353
garyi@bcm.tmc.edu
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.