Re: NCRP -136

["jenday1" <jenday1@EMAIL.MSN.COM>]

Jerry,

Obviously you have not read NCRP-136, otherwise you would have noted that

subjects like hormesis and adaptive response ARE discussed.  Some references

are even cited.  Check the table of contents and the index.



I think you letter would be more effective it you indicate specific

instances in which the report erred.  Unless you are specific, any comments

will be lack impact.  It is like complaining you had a bad serivce from the

IRS without telling them what the problem was.  Otherwise, it sounds you are

just whining.





-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

3050 Traymore Lane

Bowie, MD 20715-2024

jenday1@email.msn.com (H)







Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:53:11 -0700

From: "Jerry Cohen" <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>

Subject: NCRP-136



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



- ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C12E3E.D3CF1AE0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Following are my comments on NCRP-136. I'm afraid that no matter how =

hard I tried, I was unable to avoid the nasty tone. I would appreciate =

your comments on my comments.          Jerry

- ------------------------------------

Re: Comments on NCRP Report No. 136, " Evaluation of the =

Linear-Nonthreshold Model for Ionizing Radiation"=20

. . .







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.