Re: Interesting exchange of "views" with anti-nuclear activists

[DWhitfil@KDHE.STATE.KS.US]

Ted wrote:



"It is VERY interesting that a person who is touted to be so correct can

make such an obviously wrong statement and still have credibility."



It is an extraordinarily special talent indeed. I suppose it goes back to

the old adage "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, you baffle them

with bull paddies." <Censored version>



<Dave wistfully thinks to himself "Wish I could do that...nahhh...still

have way too much honor and integrity left." Of course Dave realizes that

the honorable person often goes hungry...and cold...hmmmmmmmmm...>



My opinions only...



DJWhitfill







It is VERY interesting that a person who is touted to be so correct can

make such an obviously wrong statement and still have credibility.





                                                                                                                             

                    Ted de Castro                                                                                            

                    <tdc@XRAYTED.COM>              To:     "radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>       

                    Sent by:                       cc:                                                                       

                    owner-radsafe@list.vand        Subject:     Re: Interesting exchange of "views" with anti-nuclear        

                    erbilt.edu                     activists                                                                 

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             

                    10/18/01 01:41 PM                                                                                        

                    Please respond to Ted                                                                                    

                    de Castro                                                                                                

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             









It is VERY interesting that a person who is touted to be so correct can

make such an obviously wrong statement and still have credibility.



I refer to the comment about the military "reasons" for civilian nukes!



Forget the fact that the burn-up in power plants is way to much to allow

useful Pu extraction - as has been stated here many times - BUT just the

OBVIOUS fact that to get the Pu out - you must process the fuel rods -

and YET they refer to the fuel rod storage site where ALL these are kept

- awaiting disposal - INSTEAD of being reprocessed.



So - Mr 30 yr nuke engineer - how does the military get Pu out of burnt

up fuel in storage?

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.









************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.