Re: Interesting exchange of "views" with anti-nuclear activists

[Ted de Castro <tdc@XRAYTED.COM>]

It is VERY interesting that a person who is touted to be so correct can

make such an obviously wrong statement and still have credibility.



I refer to the comment about the military "reasons" for civilian nukes!



Forget the fact that the burn-up in power plants is way to much to allow

useful Pu extraction - as has been stated here many times - BUT just the

OBVIOUS fact that to get the Pu out - you must process the fuel rods -

and YET they refer to the fuel rod storage site where ALL these are kept

- awaiting disposal - INSTEAD of being reprocessed.



So - Mr 30 yr nuke engineer - how does the military get Pu out of burnt

up fuel in storage?

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.