[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NRC website restored (somewhat)





You don't suppose that all of this becomes a mute point given that any

attack would probably be well planned with sufficient recon done to

accomplish the mission (including any necessary data logging using GPS).

I'm sure that any attack would not be done willy nilly at the spur the

moment, with final target selection accomplished by pulling some piece of

paper out of a hat...after all this isn't a scavenger hunt.



My opinions only...



DJWhitfill





                                                                                                                            

                    maury                                                                                                   

                    <maury@WEBTEXAS.COM>          To:     "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>                

                    Sent by:                      cc:     RadSafe <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>                             

                    owner-radsafe@list.vand       Subject:     Re: NRC website restored (somewhat)                          

                    erbilt.edu                                                                                              

                                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                            

                    10/26/01 07:17 PM                                                                                       

                    Please respond to maury                                                                                 

                                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                            









John, I can only say that I think (believe) that individuals in the upper

echelons of NRC know of sources like these. To emphasize: I have NO

FIRSTHAND

knowledge of NRC's awareness - I can only infer that there surely is a

sprinkling of NRC people at all levels who are aware of such charts and

maps.



I was wrong about the ease of pinpointing a nuclear plant on Sectional and

Terminal Area Charts for aviation - the scales respectively are 1:500,000

and

1:250,000 and there is not a dot on the chart showing the plant, but there

is a

marking for the highest obstruction[ e.g., cooling tower or radio antenna.

Thought I could recall which obstruction marking was the correct one at

Glen

Rose Texas just from having driven past it, but it has been too long ago.

In any

case, I apologize for this exaggeration..



The Geological Survey quadrangle charts , however, cover the entire US and

those

(used for example for backpacking, and so on) are available in the scales I

cited. Additionally, USGS aerial photo maps now cover very large areas (if

not

all) of the US. Some commercial aerial photography also is generally

available.

Finally, satellite photography covering most of the world has been

generally

available to the public in exquisitely detailed scales. I am confident that

finding power plants after having driven past them would pose no big

problem on

such photography. In all such instances, measuring lat/long is easy..



The whole issue of security vs. cost is intriguing. Security is not about

whether or not you can keep something secret; it is about what resources,

especially time, are required to find, break, or otherwise compromise that

which

you wish to keep secret. By this criterion, NRC has made it less convenient

to

pinpoint the lat/long of our nuclear power plants. Instead of looking on

the NRC

web site, now I have to dig up one of my topo charts to measure the numbers

for

the Texas Utilities Glen Rose NPP. Possibly this along with reassuring the

public is the rationale being used by NRC.

Maury Siskel    maury@webtexas.com

=============================================

"Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" wrote:



> Maury,

> Do you think the NRC knows about this?

> -- John

> John Jacobus, MS

> Certified Health Physicist

> 3050 Traymore Lane

> Bowie, MD  20715-2024

>

> E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)

> -----Original Message-----

> From: maury [mailto:maury@WEBTEXAS.COM]

> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:39 AM

> To: High Plains Drifter

> Cc: Sandy Perle; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Subject: Re: NRC website restored (somewhat)

>

> In this instance, the precise lat/long of any plant in the US can be

measured

> quite accurately

> (what error percentage would you like?) on sectional aeronautical charts,

or

> USGS topo

> maps at scales (detail) as large as 1/25,000, as well as from other

sources.

> .



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.









************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.