[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Can nuclear reactors survive a terrorist attack?
I thought that the Sandia crash test video
really "saved" the program -- imagine what it would have been like without it --
pretty one-sided : the antis got to parade Chernobyl again, with no hint
at all given to the audience that it had no containment dome and that the huge
pile of burning graphite (absent in LWRs) greatly aggravated the fallout
situation (never mind the rest of the long list of design deficiencies and
contraventions of operating rules...).
The CBS crew did a good job of contrasting
the glass WTC buildings to the steel & concrete of NPPs.
OTOH, there was no mention of the lack of
off-site radiological consequences of the TMI meltdown, during the part about
armed terrorist ground attack on NPPs -- the implication that the viewer was
left with was, again, a Chernobyl-type disaster -- reinforced by Levethal's
ravings about "thousands of casualties."
Late last week, at my request, my colleague
Jeremy added some graphic information to his new FAQ item on how nuclear plants
are protected from terrorist attacks ( at http://www.ncf.ca/~cz725/cnf_sectionD.htm#terrorist ), concerning structures "within the
outer containment building visible at most nuclear stations (e.g. the Gentilly-2
and Pt. Lepreau CANDU plants in Canada) are further levels of
heavy concrete enclosures
<http://www.magma.ca/~whitlock/cnf/containment.jpg>
(including a "reactor vault" surrounding the core itself, consisting of at
minimum 4-foot-thick concrete walls in CANDU plants)
" ....it shows the reactor (in red) nestled
inside a veritable maze of walls...
Anyone know when the digitised
version of that Sandia crash test video will be put on their web site
?
Thanks.
Jaro
From: jenday1 [mailto:jenday1@EMAIL.MSN.COM]
Sent: Sunday October 14, 2001 11:19 PM
To: RADSAFE
Subject: Can nuclear reactors survive a terrorist attack?
If you saw the "60 Minutes" segment on nuclear reactor safety last
night,
what did you think of it?
-- John