[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Risk

To: "Dukelow, James S Jr" <jim.dukelow@PNL.GOV>, <RuthWeiner@AOL.COM>, <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Subject: RE: Risk
From: "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:17:35 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <228C5EBB26701542946C14D5205AE6D5044371EC@pnlmse08.pnl.gov>
Reply-To: "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> If people perceive a risk much different from the realistically estimated risk, let's just tell them they are wrong. I recognize that DOE and NRC pander to perceived risk, but that doesn't mean everyone has to.

Amen!

TR

References:
- RE: Risk
  - From: "Dukelow, James S Jr" <jim.dukelow@PNL.GOV>

Prev by Date: US Bill: Mandatory KI Stockpiling
Next by Date: RE: Norm avoids nothing!
Prev by thread: RE: Risk
Next by thread: Re: Risk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread