Re: From NCI- News Hours Transcript 11/2/01; Focus- Nuclear Safeguards

["Michael Stabin" <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>]

Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 05:16:17 -0800 (PST)

From: mark sasser <duke99301@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: Re: From NCI- News Hours Transcript 11/2/01; Focus- Nuclear

Safeguards



- --0-169765922-1005657377=:41604

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii





 Here is all I have to say on this. More NUKEs Less kukes!

I have worked in Nukes 26 years and I feel they are more safe than working

at a Chemical plant, or a gas turbine site.

I have worked IP2 and 3 and I eel the people there house and contactors take

great pride of there plant. Iseen a lot of good people work hard to make

sure the plants are safe. In the last year.

  dkosloff1 <dkosloff1@EMAIL.MSN.COM> wrote: Norm,



You are trained on the English language, human behavior and logic. Why then

would you ask the following rhetorical question:

"Is it impossible for radsafers to have a civil discussion?"



You know the answer is "no, it is not impossible", because it often occurs.



However, I might ask if it is possible for anti-nukes to have a civil

discussion and that would be a more valid question. I was an anti-nuke for

about 12 years. As a result I know that their are many anti-nukes who

knowingly spread false information. I even had one anti-nuke laugh as he

told me that he had lied under oath about his experience with containments.

So the real question is whether or not a discussion that includes dishonest

words is a civil conversation, if the liar smiles and laughs while he lies.



Don Kosloff

dkosloff1@msn.com

2910 Main Street, Perry OH 44081





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.





Mark S. Sasser