[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Ship Yard Workers - John Boice

To: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>, "Muckerheide" <muckerheide@MEDIAONE.NET>, "John Williams" <JohnWi@law.com>, <hflong@pacbell.net>
Subject: RE: Ship Yard Workers - John Boice
From: "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:56:49 -0500
Cc: "radsafe" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <DB80C41F6AB988429313B8C779B9865B068E95B1@nihexchange6.nih.gov>
Reply-To: "Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Since when did "publish" mean peer reviewed?



John:



DOE, NCRP, ICRP, BEIR committees, et al. seem to hold to this definition,

since they do not include this study in their reports, although it is

clearly the best study available on the subject and was under the same

technical direction (Arthur Upton).



Ted Rockwell





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

References:
- RE: Ship Yard Workers - John Boice
  - From: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>

Prev by Date: RE: "Nothing has changed" re. buying up to 10 Candu reactors for UK [ FW]
Next by Date: tone it down, please
Prev by thread: RE: Ship Yard Workers - John Boice
Next by thread: Re: Ship Yard Workers - John Boice
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread