[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
UN Report on Chernobyl; Radiation vs. Stress
Good afternoon all,
I don't contest the issue about stress-related illnesses
being induced by wholesale evacuations and relocations.
I think that the detriments of these disruptions were
probably not correctly evaluated in the ALARA
determinations (i.e., not adequately addressing quality
of life issues); more damage was done than avoided. From
what I have understood both from reading and discussions
with colleagues in Russia, the initial conditions
justified evacuation; what may not have been justified
was the long-termed exclusion from the zones once the
situation had been brought under control.
There is another generic aspect of this I would like to
address. There seems to be an operational assumption
that the ONLY health effect from radiation exposure is
cancer. From a mechanical perspective, cancer is easily
measured in mortality studies, and at higher doses it is
fairly easy to demonstrate the link. Morbidity (getting
sick but not necessarily dieing) is not so easily
measured. Because of the difficulty of performing such
a study, there aren't that many morbidity studies on
radiation; and those that do exist are pretty much open
to interpretation as to cause. I have always been
curious if there were effects from radiation that were
present, but that could not be found due to the
limitations of morbidity studies. And if these effects
exist, then how can we say that cancer is the only
endpoint?
I spent some time looking into the literature on
non-carcinogenic effects. There is a study out of
Obninsk (Ivanov) that demonstrates a link between
non-carcinogenic effects and dose. There are several
reports of an "accelerated aging" effect being seen in
liquidators. I think there is good evidence from
radiobiology literature that suggests moderate doses of
radiation (delivered at relatively high dose rates) can
trigger illness (especially if stress is also involved).
There is clear evidence that the neurologic system is
functionally sensitive to radiation (at fairly high dose
rates, but remarkably low doses). In certain
individuals, this sensitivity could trigger sickness
behaviors.
I don't think this is an issue with residents of the
Chernobyl affected areas (doses and dose rates were too
low), but I do think it is a factor with the liquidators
(and perhaps a contributor to illnesses in the Mayak
populations as well).
I wrote a paper on the subject that was recently
published in Medical Hypotheses. The abstract is
available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retr
ieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11601868&dopt=Abstract
If any of you would like a reprint, please email me and I
will get a copy to you.
Jim Barnes, CHP
james.g.barnes@att.net
========================
Friends,
Confirming the LNT fraud continues! Maybe its time that
we reconsider
radiation health effects and radiation protection
policies that
increasingly demonstrate only a willingness to defraud
the public!? (As
the head of one national program hissed at me in 1999,
"You just want to
kill the golden goose!")
Note that the UN reports here are NOT just UNSCEAR, but
the Development
Programme and UNICEF!
Do you have access to the UN Report, or other media
reports?
Regards, Jim Muckerheide
Radiation, Science, and Health
====================
'Myth' of Chernobyl suffering exposed
Relocation and hand-outs have caused more illness than
radiation, a new
UN study concludes.
Anthony Browne
Sunday January 6, 2002
The Observer <http://www.observer.co.uk>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/