Re: radon - documentation of exposure histories for Iowa study

["Rad health" <healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM>]

Howard,



Could you be more specific why you think Iowa is an outlier?



Regarding Norm, I don't think he pretends to be an expert on all issues nor 

do I.



Don Smith







>From: hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net

>Reply-To: hflong@pacbell.net

>To: Rad health <healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM>

>CC: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

>Subject: Re: radon - documentation of exposure histories for Iowa study

>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:39:26 -0800

>

>Dear Don,

>

>Not "dismissal" of credibility of persons, but skepticsm about some data 

>they present, (as I have with Field's choice of outlier location Iowa and

>non-smoking lung cancer "controls") is necessary for critical peer review.  

>Muckerheide's blunt political commentary is a good balance to agitating

>public perceptions by anti-nuc Norm. Neither controls the list.





_________________________________________________________________

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/