I agree. When I was in Primary School, I think I learned that 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100. Now if they had complained and said let's stay at 50 mSv for every year (i.e. 250 mSv for five years), I think it would have been worth a whole lot more.
Regards,
Chris Davey
"Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" wrote:
Do anyone besides me think it is silly to reject a 20 mSv limit/y for a 100
mSv/5 y limit?
It will be interesting to see if the French political system is like ours.
Any bets on whether or not the new limits are approved?-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD 20715-2024
--
Provincial RSO / LSO / U-VSO
Alberta Cancer Board, Room 4027, 11560 University Ave,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2. (780) 432-8665 fax 432-8986
email: cdavey@med.phys.ualberta.ca chris.davey@cancerboard.ab.ca
pager number (780) 917-2043