Re: Lung cancer mortality from radon versus mortality from other<plus> Radon...

["Rad health" <healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM>]

Howard,



Why do you keep saying this.  What point do you hope to make.  Do you 

believe if you say it enough someone will believe it if by chance they 

understand it.  This is silliness.  Perform your double blind studies, who 

is stopping you?  Also, to save bandwidth, please edit your postings.



Don









>Mea culpa! I, too, extrapolated (estimated beyond data at hand) with "Iowa 

>women - 1% outlier of USA lung cancer mortality, 1/radon." What IS in

>Cohen's data is that Iowa women had only  0.3 standard deviations of 

>inverse association - lung cancer mortality vs radon, whereas p< 0.001 

>chance

>(many SDs) for whole USA (minus mobile CA, FL, AZ). So Iowa is different, 

>clouding inference to the USA.

>

>We need placebo studies - identical controls!

>

>Howard Long





_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/