[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Gertz & Wash Times on targeting NPP's
Hope others will object to articles like this ....
Follows text of letter to Editor, Wash. Times.
===========================
Subject: Nuclear Plants [supposed] Target
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:00:42 -0600
From: maury <maury@webtexas.com>
To: letters@washingtontimes.com
Dear Editor,
Aside from content of the article, the headline claiming that nuclear
plants are terrorist targets is silly and falls way short of Bill Gertz'
and the Times' statures. You both know full well that potential targets
include just about every US location from major bridges, sports
stadiums, to major water systems. You have assisted the government
promotion of irrational fears of anything nuclear. Plenty of experts in
government know as a result of many tests and analyses, that nuclear
power plants are far less vulnerable than a large number of other
potential target categories. Please cease promoting irrational public
fears and unreasoning worries..
Sincerely,
Maury Siskel
_________________________
Extract of news column:
Nuclear plants targeted
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
U.S. intelligence agencies have issued an internal alert that
Islamic terrorists are planning another spectacular attack to
rival those carried out on September 11.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/