[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cohen's Refutation of LNT



John,  An excellent statement of "the bottom line." That's one side of the coin. 



The other side of that coin is that it is the rad protection establishment that continuously justifies those costs/programs.  



The constant blaming of "anti's" and "the media" is nonsense. They are just "useful fools" to the interests that promulgate false information by the agencies that fund/support the people/tools of ICRP/NCRP/BRER/NIH Radiation Study Section etc., etc. 



Regards, Jim



 

-----Original Message-----

From:	AndrewsJP@AOL.COM [mailto:AndrewsJP@AOL.COM]



In a message dated 2/9/2002 6:35:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, 

hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net writes:



> Application of the precautionary principle requires that we explore supplying

> deprived peoples with what now appears to be an essential trace energy : 

> about 1 rem/year of ionizing radiation.

> Shades of fluoridation, or, better, iodized salt choice!

> 

> Howard Long



Oh, but we must be more cautious than just exploring the effect of the 

deprivation of "essential trace energy!"  The bigest effect of the 

precautionary principle as applied to LNT is the massive expense of urgently 

needed money spent on trivial exposure prevention, specifically the 10 

mrem/year EPA standard and all the engingeering that Ruth(s) and her cohorts 

(and I in past years) have done to prevent or design around limits based on 

LNT -- a precautionary principle.  To what end.  Have we saved even one life? 

 I think not.  In fact we have probably caused many more to occur in other 

venues because of the misdirected funds.



My thoughts of a mispent youth.



John Andrews

Knoxville, Tennessee











************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/