RE: Cohen's Refutation of LNT

["Jim Muckerheide" <jmuckerheide@cnts.wpi.edu>]

-----Original Message----- 

From: Rad health [mailto:healthrad@hotmail.com] 



The quality of the study should be judged by both the internal and external

validity of the study itself after a good review.  It is sad, too many

papers are judged by their findings and not by the qulity of the study

itself, which is not science but rather political spin.



<Wrong science. One study doesn't count. It must be confirmed and considered in the context of what is known. These matters are addressed in Intro and Discussion of substantial studies.>

 

Isn't it interesting that Steve Milloy lists Colditz as one of the worst

junk scientists but posts an article by Field as good science?



<Shows you consider people instead of science as determining validity of results.>



Jim







_________________________________________________________________

Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

http://www.hotmail.com





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/