[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cohen's Refutation of LNT



Bill,

 

Wrong again. I do send a few papers for info/comment that MAY indicate hormesis, but don't consider them "good science" unless the specifics are consistent with the known biology and medicine results.  I depend on knowledgeable scientists for that assessment. 

 

My 'bottom feeder' comment was directed at the agency bureaucrats that withdrew and revised the report, not scientists. (Defensive?)

 

No "top of food-chain" here. I have no funding or career that depends on those agencies, nor any establishment industry support (my documenting the truth on rad health effects has potential adverse effects on their multi-hundred billion profiteering on the public fraud); and my addressing of their fraudulent actions is detrimental to my career, as you would expect. It would seem EPA may be at the "top of the radiation food chain." The question is: Who would replace them as an organization that would treat science honestly?

 

Jim



	-----Original Message----- 

	From: field [mailto:bill-field@uiowa.edu] 

	Sent: Sun 10-Feb-02 12:59 PM 

	To: Jim Muckerheide; AndrewsJP@AOL.COM; hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net; healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM 

	Cc: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu 

	Subject: Re: Cohen's Refutation of LNT

	

	



	Jim,

	

	What amazes me about you is that you embrace any study that you think

	supports hormesis as good science and any study that does not support it as

	junk science.  It is so easy to see thru your propoganda.  Try looking at

	the strengths and limitations of all science and stop trying to degrade

	scientist that make a real effort to perform good science by calling them

	bottom feeders.  Do you consider yourself top of the foor chain?

	

	

	> The constant blaming of "anti's" and "the media" is nonsense. They are

	just "useful fools" to the interests that promulgate false information by

	the agencies that fund/support the people/tools of ICRP/NCRP/BRER/NIH

	Radiation Study Section etc., etc.

	>

	> Regards, Jim

	>

	

	

	



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/