[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dose limits for members of the public
Title: Re: dose limits for members of the
public
Barbara L. Hamrick responed
"There's not really evidence to support that there's harm
either." in response to sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET
comment: :"I also don't agree that we can say that there
is no harm to a worker when they have received 5 rem for each
year of their employment. There is no evidence to support
that."
Colleagues, Both are correct.
This is why, as scientists, we should push for a double blind human
study at a dose level where there is no evidence of harm, such as the
background dose in the U.S, mountains, such as i propose in my
article: Is radiation an essential trace
energy? Physics and Society October 2001
http://www.aps.org/units/fps/oct01/a5oct01.html
I
see no chance that the problem can be solved without better data. I
expect that the result of the double blind study will support health
benefits at low dose rates.
A
recent thesis by Rima Habib of 7000 Australian nuclear workers shows
lower death rate from all causes and lower cancer mortality similar
to that found in the nuclear shipyard worker study and the British
radiologist study for radiologists in the period
1955-1979. This does not prove anything but it
strengthens the evidence for beneficial effects:
.
ANSTO Briefing - Lucas
Heights Epidemiological Study
7 August
2001
Ms Rima
Habib, today presented to the ANSTO workforce the findings of her
doctoral thesis recently submitted to the University of New South
Wales. This independent study looked at the risk of contracting
cancer from workplace exposure to low-level ionising radiation.
After more than six years of analysis of more than 7000 past and
present employees' records spanning five decades, the workforce at
the Lucas Heights Science and Technology Centre has been found to
have lower cancer mortality rates than the general population of New
South Wales as a whole. This was part of a research program being
carried out in conjunction with the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC) in France.
Comprehensive analyses of the data will be made available through
forthcoming publications in appropriate scientific journals.
Overall, the results indicate that the Lucas Heights' workforce
have had lower all-cause and cancer mortality rates than the general
population and that this effect persists, throughout their
employment. In particular:
1. Lucas Heights employees have had
mortality rates from all causes some 31% less than the general
Australian population.
2. Lucas
Heights employees have had mortality rates from all cancers some 19%
less than the general NSW population.
3. There has been no
significant difference between their leukemia rates and those of the
general population.
In addition to the comparison with the NSW population the Lucas
Heights data were analysed to compare the cancer rates of the
radiation workers from the non-radiation workers. This showed that
there was no significant difference between the cancer mortality
rates for radiation and non-radiation workers for a range of 32
specific cancer types, except for the groups of brain and central
nervous system cancers, and kidney. These forms of cancer have not
previously been associated with radiation exposure and the results
are therefore likely to be due to the small numbers of cancer deaths
in these groups.
The data for radiation workers were also analysed by their cumulative
occupational exposure to radiation over the period of study,
including non-Lucas Heights exposure. The analysis showed that of the
32 cancer types analysed, there were no recorded cancers in 10 of the
types. Of the other 22 cancer types, 21 showed no statistically
significant trends and one, lung cancer mortality, was borderline
significant. However, lung cancer is known to be affected by a number
of other factors, such as smoking, but the study was not able to
comprehensively analyse for these other confounding factors. Cancer
incidence was also analysed in the study.
The Lucas Heights data, which relate to employees from 1957-1998,
have now been assembled, checked and transmitted to IARC. They will
be incorporated into a large study, which will, for the first time
bring together data from 17 countries to estimate the risk of
contracting cancer from exposure to radiation in the workplace. The
results of this combined analysis are expected in the early part of
2002.
ENDS
I plan to order a copy of the thesis but it will require a
month or so to obtain it.
Best wishes, John
Cameron
--
John R. Cameron (jrcamero@facstaff.wisc.edu)
2678 SW 14th St. Gainesville, FL 32608
(352) 371-9865 Fax (352) 371-9866
(until May 2002)
PO Box 405, Lone Rock,WI 53556
(608) 583-2160; Fax (608) 583-2269
May 2002- October 2002