[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Response to Norman Cohen



Norm



FYI, most of the medical isotopes produced in North America come from an

aging reactor at Chalk River, Ontario which is soon to be replaced.



J. R. Johnson

Ex CRNL employee.



----- Original Message -----

From: Norman Cohen <ncohen12@comcast.net>

To: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 7:41 AM

Subject: Re: Response to Norman Cohen





> Ruth,

> I'm no expert, but I understand that there are small reactors like the

> one in Australia, who's purpose is to make medical isotopes. I also

> understand that there are alternative methods for making these isotopes.

> Either way is fine with me. My focus is the commercial nukes.

>

> As far as NIRS, again, I'm not NIRS' representative to Radsafe, so feel

> free to take it up with them.

>

> As far as my humor, I know you don't find it funny, so I'm sorry, but no

> free tickets for you when I start my new career as a stand-up comic

> after I've gotten Salem shut down. ;-)

>

> norm

>

>

> RuthWeiner@aol.com wrote:

>

> > In a message dated 3/29/02 2:41:39 PM Mountain Standard Time,

> > ncohen12@comcast.net writes:

> >

> >

> >

> >> that I support nuclear

> >> medicine.

> >

> > If nuclear reactors are all shut down, how do you propose that

> > medically used isotopes be made?

> >

> > NIRS's "explanation" of their use of "Mobile Chernobyl" greatly

> > distorts what would happen to a spent fuel cask in an accident.  They

> > know it is a distortion.  Besides, even their scenario would not

> > duplicate the Chernobyl accident because the latter involves fuel in

> > the reactor, and cooled fuel that has been out of the reactor for at

> > least several years is what is transported.  Certainly you believe

> > them.  You want to.  And to the uninformed person, their  explanation

> > might even make some sense.  A colleague of mine used to give a very

> > convincing lecture about phlogiston, too.  Sure, if an organization

> > distorts the facts sufficiently then they can justify any term they

> > want.  This does answer my question:  NIRS does use the term, and

> > justifies its use with a made-up, disingenuously  distorted scenario.

> >

> > For the record, I don't find your "humor" funny, though I may be alone

> > in this..

> > Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.

> > ruthweiner@aol.com

>

> --

> Coalition for Peace and Justice and the UNPLUG Salem Campaign; 321 Barr

> Ave., Linwood, NJ 08221; 609-601-8583 or 609-601-8537;

> ncohen12@comcast.net  UNPLUG SALEM WEBSITE:

> http://www.unplugsalem.org/  COALITION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE WEBSITE:

> http://www.coalitionforpeaceandjustice.org   The Coalition for Peace and

> Justice is a chapter of Peace Action.

> "First they ignore you; Then they laugh at you; Then they fight you;

> Then you win. (Gandhi) "Why walk when you can fly?"  (Mary Chapin

> Carpenter)

>

>

>

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/