Jack Earley
Radiological Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: Helms, Marlin [mailto:Marlin.Helms@FERNALD.GOV]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:31 PM
To: 'RuthWeiner@AOL.COM'; rorthen@EARTHSCIENCES.NET; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: RE: FW: submarines and NormI don't believe that statement referred to the Navy's safety record he was quite proud of it and it showed when he made comparisons to the commercial industry. A case in point would be when he drank coolant from an operating Navy reactor. Secrecy was stock in trade for a Cold War Warrior.-----Original Message-----
From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM [mailto:RuthWeiner@AOL.COM]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:46 PM
To: rorthen@EARTHSCIENCES.NET; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: FW: submarines and Norm
You raise an excellent point. There has been little, if any public
opposition to the Nuclear Navy, at least in the U.S. Why? Maybe it's
because the Navy has a whole different attitude regarding RP
Bill Lipton
A Nuclear Navy acquaintance quoted Admiral Rickover to the effect that "we paint them gray and don't talk about them."
Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com
******************** DISCLAIMER ********************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect
the views of the company.
***************************************************