[Fwd: Comment on Editorial/Op-Ed]

[maury <maury@WEBTEXAS.COM>]

Hi John and others,



Thanks loads for posting that editorial from the NYTimes. What a

pleasant surprise! Because I'm so ready to complain to the media, it

seemed appropriate to also respond to this one. I thought the editorial

was well done.



Thanks again, John, for posting it. Gee, maybe the talking chicken is

the real marvel after all rather than the falling sky!  (VBG)

Cheers,

Maury



The URL for the editorial is: 

==============================================

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Comment on Editorial/Op-Ed

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:45:10 -0500

From: maury <maury@webtexas.com>

To: letters@nytimes.com



Re: Nuclear Waste on the Highways dated April 21, 2002.



Dear Editor;



Please accept my gratitude for publishing the above item. I appreciate

the fact that it expressed an opinion which then was substantiated by a

few pertinent facts to support the opinion. Yet, at the same time you

presented a fair synopsis of the opposing views and especially the

reasons for them. I am biased - I think nuclear power has been receiving

a "bum rap" for decades from the government and the media not to mention

the vocal anti-nuclear zealots among us.



Thanks very much for your treatment of the myths surrounding the

so-called dangers of spent fuel transportation.



Sincerely,

Maury Siskel

4516 Cummings Drive

Ft. Worth Texas 76180

817-498-7135

maury@webtexas.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/