[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The LNT debate
I have down loaded the following pdf articles that were published in the
journal, Medical Physics, in 1998. If you would like copies, please reply
to me directly at my work address, jjacobus@mail.nih.gov.
1. POINT/COUNTERPOINT: The LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of
risk from low-level (Less
than 100 mSv/year) radiation, and Low levels of radon in homes should be
considered harmful to health
Daniel J. Strom, John R. Cameron, and Bernard L. Cohen
2. The linear no-threshold debate: Where do we go from here?
Kenneth L. Mossman
3. The linear no-threshold response: Why not linearity?
Warren K. Sinclair
4. The linear no-threshold dose-effect relation: Is it relevant to
radiation protection regulation?
Rudi H. Nussbaum
5. The linear no-threshold debate: A summary
E. W. Webster
6a. Proposition: Radiation hormesis should be elevated to a position of
scientifc respectability
John R. Cameron and John E. Moulder
6b. Erratum: ''The linear no-threshold debate: A summary''
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD 20715-2024
E-mail: jenday1@email.msn.com (H)
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/