A rad engineer is a health physicist working as
a rad engineer. If you're interested, I can send you the definitions Hanford
uses for both positions. Your implications are neither necessary nor
appreciated.
I just noticed a typo when it came over the server, so
I wanted to correct myself in case it was unclear. As Qunitilian said in about
1500 B.C., communicate so you can't be misunderstood. And if I repeat it four
more times, there will be a 70 percent retention. ;-)
Jack Earley Radiological Engineer
A
rad engineer is a health physicist working as a rad engineer. If you're
interested, I can send you the definitions Hanford uses for both positions.
You're implications are neither necessary nor appreciated.
Jack Earley Radiological Engineer
For some reason, I just can't resist
responding. First, any antismoking ordinance I sponsor will be
a long way from Pomona, CA or anywhere else in CA for that
matter.
Second, what's this community ordinance
stuff? My focus is to have smoking banned within 10 miles of the
surface of the earth.
Third, having quit 22 years ago, I now have a
great deal of difficulty understanding how anyone can be a health
physicist and smoke. Rad engineer, yes, rad protection person, maybe,
but health physicist? Na-a-a-h!
Les Aldrich
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 8:49
PM
Subject: Re: Radon Field Day
In a message dated
05/18/2002 8:19:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, epirad@mchsi.com writes:
. If you do not currently have a smokefree
ordinance in your community I would encourage each radsafer to start
such an effort similar to the one in Iowa City
No
offense, but please start somewhere very, very far away from Pomona, CA.
Thank you,
Barbara
|