[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: KI

To: Susan McElrath <smhp@BELLSOUTH.NET>
Subject: Re: KI
From: Mike Lantz <mlantz33@CYBERTRAILS.COM>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:47:55 -0700
CC: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
References: <000c01c24081$712b09c0$a2a25141@susan>
Reply-To: Mike Lantz <mlantz33@CYBERTRAILS.COM>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Because the NUREG that originally said just that was pulled and rewritten because KI is much better -- it is magic. A NUREG that would tout restriction of food stuffs and evacuation is far too complicated. Isn't it much simplier to rush back to your house and stuff a KI pill down your baby's throat? Or better yet ---- a KI spray that you carry with you. You can't make enough money on the truth, so let them buy KI or try to distribute it. I gave it my best to help the public. I will try to in the future, I'm sure. It's been a losing battle.

Mike Lantz, CHP

Susan McElrath wrote:

It is time to rethink the KI issue from the ground up to reflect changes in our society since the nuclear age began. Why do I not see recommendations to restrict milk intake following an incident, and forget the worries about mass distribution of KI?

Susan McElrath
voice: (770) 222-0829
fax: (801) 838-5284
cell: (770) 633-8591
smhp@bellsouth.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: KI
  - From: William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>

References:
- KI
  - From: "Susan McElrath" <smhp@BELLSOUTH.NET>

Prev by Date: Radiological Stress Victims, my experience
Next by Date: Re: KI
Prev by thread: KI
Next by thread: Re: KI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread