[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ICRP60 TISSUE WEIGHTING FACTORS : HOW CALCULATED?
John,
thank you for suggesting me to read Roger Clarke's explanation "1990
Recommandations of ICRP". Actually the consideration of "Lethality" and
"Loss of Life" in Table 1 made me realise that something else was to be
considered in determining the tissue risk factors than the probabilities
alone. So I looked over the ICRP 60 and found the table B-20 at page 136,
that solved my problem of understanding the origin of WT values.
Maybe someone could be interested, so I describe the simple procedure.
WT values come from the "Relative contributions" in column 6 of Table B-20.
Relative
contribution
Bone surfaces 0,009
skin 0,006
These values are rounded to WT = 0,01
Bladder 0,040
Breast 0,050
Liver 0,022
Oesophagus 0,034
Thyroid 0,021
Remainders 0,081
These values are all rounded to WT = 0,05
Colon 0,141
Lung 0,111
Bone marrow 0,143
Stomach 0,139
These values are all rounded to WT = 0,12
Gonads 0,183
rounded to WT = 0,20
Quintino
Il giorno 5-08-2002 16:28, John Johnson, idias@interchange.ubc.ca ha
scritto:
> Quintino
>
> I understand your difficulty. I found that Roger Clarke's explanation "1990
> Recommendations of ICRP" in the Supplement to the Radiological Protection
> Bulletin, No 119, 1991 helped me understand ICRP's recommended risk/tissue
> weightng factors.
>
> John
> _______________________
> John R Johnson, PhD
> idias@interchange.ubc.ca
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Quintino De Notariis" <qdenotariis@novacon.it>
> To: "'RadSafe'" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 4:39 AM
> Subject: ICRP60 TISSUE WEIGHTING FACTORS : HOW CALCULATED?
>
>
>> Recently Italian legislation adopted the criteria and terminology of
> ICRP60.
>> Could someone tell me how Tissue Weighting Factors WT in ICRP60 have been
>> calculated?
>> I mean, these factors in the old ICRP26 can be easily calculated from Risk
>> Factors per Sievert. For exemple, the Risk Factor fr Breast is 2.5E-3 and
>> the Total Risk Factor is 16.5E-3; so WT is :
>> 2.5/16.5 = 0,15
>> The same way you can proceed with Red Bone Marrow, whose Risk Factor per
>> Sievert is 2.0E-3 :
>> 2.0/16.5 = 0,12
>> I can't find a similar procedure for the new WT values in ICRP60.
>> I think we should use the values in Table 4, pag. 24 of the publication,
> but
>> there must be something else to consider that I don't know.
>> Could someone help me?
>>
>> Quintino De Notariis
>> Health Physicist
>> Corso Vittorio Emanuele 45/E
>> 86039 Termoli
>>
>> ************************************************************************
>> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
>> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
>> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
>> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/