[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Relevance of experts



Jerry,

Just out of curiosity, why do you think any $$$$ (money) saved "which might

then be allocated toward

useful objectives?"  It will be squandered another way.  Like regulating

chlorine in your drinking water.



-- John 

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist 

3050 Traymore Lane

Bowie, MD  20715-2024



E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)      



-----Original Message-----

From: Jerry Cohen [mailto:jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET]

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:43 PM

To: John Jacobus; RADSAFE

Subject: Re: Relevance of experts





John,

    A few comments to clarify my position (hopefully):

1. to answer your original question, I wouldn't worry about any dose below

~1.0 rem/a. above background

2. In my estimation, the optimal dose range is somewhere between 1.0 and

100.0 rem/a.

3. At a dose of 10.0rem/a, in the unlikely event that adverse effects should

occur,  there could also be offsetting positive effects.

4. Like all other physical and chemical  agents , radiation likely causes a

wide range of dose related effects. Such effects could be either positive or

negative in nature. For a given individual at any given dose level, health

consequences reflect the sum of these effects. Certain rare hypersensitive

individuals might indeed have  adverse  effects at  low doses analogous to

allergic reactions to some chemical agents.

5. I don't believe it is prudent to set exposures standards based on effects

to the most sensitive individuals, but that is only my opinion.

6. Finally, if the maximum allowable dose were set at 1.0 rem/a (10.0

mSv/a), we would save a lot of $$$$$$, which might then be allocated toward

useful objectives.



. . .

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/